The common idea of how financial markets work often consists of a simplified view of the balance of power between buyers and sellers. We often encounter the claim that price rises because the market is dominated by the number of people willing to buy. However, this interpretation is technically inaccurate and prevents a deeper understanding of market dynamics. The real driver of change is not the number of participants, but the complex interaction between different types of orders and the degree of aggressiveness with which these orders are executed.
The mechanism of absolute parity in every trade
The basic building block of every executed trade is the necessary balance, where for every buying side there must be an exactly corresponding selling side. If someone acquires one lot of an asset on the exchange, someone else must have handed it over to them at the same time and at the identical price level. It follows that the total volume of executed purchases always mathematically equals the volume of sales. If we were therefore to look for the cause of price movement only in the number of transactions, we would find that the market is in a state of eternal parity, which in itself would not lead to any movement. Price movement is therefore the result of something other than the simple number of participants or unstructured volume.
The battle between passive liquidity and active aggression
Price movement occurs only at the moment when a different approach to executing buying and selling intentions enters the game. In this context, market participants must be divided into passive and active players. Passive actors use limit orders, which they place into the order book at specific price levels known as Bid and Ask. These orders represent available liquidity and patiently wait until the market reaches them. Opposite them stand active players, who use market orders with the aim of entering a position immediately at any currently available price. It is precisely these aggressors who actively consume waiting liquidity and thereby directly cause changes in the price level.
Consumption of supply as a catalyst for market movement
Price does not move because of the mere existence of orders, but because of their systematic draining from the market. When active buyers show a high degree of impatience and begin buying at market prices, they gradually exhaust all limit orders at the current Ask level. If their demand persists and there is no longer anyone willing to sell at that level, they are forced to satisfy their needs at the next, higher price level, where another portion of liquidity is waiting. It is precisely this process of absorbing limit orders upward or downward that causes what we perceive on the chart as a trend. Price therefore does not rise because there are more buyers in the market, but because active buyers are willing to accept higher prices, thereby overcoming the passive resistance of sellers.
Dependence of movement on the resistance of the counterparty
Understanding this mechanism explains why an identical volume of active trades can trigger diametrically different market reactions depending on the environment. In a situation with low liquidity, where the order book is relatively empty, a small active volume is enough for the price to jump sharply by dozens of points. Conversely, if the market shows a high density of passive orders, even a massive wave of market purchases can hit an unyielding wall of limit orders. In such a case, a phenomenon occurs that we call absorption. The passive side of the market is then able to absorb all incoming aggression without allowing the price to move from its place, which is often a sign of the presence of large institutions.
Interpretation of volume as a measure of expended effort
For a deeper understanding of the market, it is therefore necessary to perceive volume not as an independent statistic, but as a relationship between the effort expended by the aggressive side and the actual result achieved on the chart. If we witness high volume accompanied by only minimal price movement, it is clear that the aggressive side has encountered a dominant counterparty that controls the given level. The true art of volume analysis therefore does not lie in mechanically monitoring the number of traded lots, but in deciphering whether active players are able to effectively break through the barriers of passive liquidity, or whether their energy ends up in the hands of more patient and capital-stronger opponents. This perspective allows a trader to identify moments when the market is preparing for a reversal or, conversely, for a strong continuation of the trend.
Warning! This material is not intended as investment advice. Data on past results do not guarantee future profits. Investing in foreign currencies may affect your returns due to their fluctuations. Every securities trade may bring both profits and losses. The assumptions and expectations stated in the material are only estimates, which may not be accurate and may change according to current economic conditions. These statements do not guarantee future performance.
In the era before the internet, success in financial markets was often conditioned by access to exclusive information. Today, the situation is the opposite. We live in an age of information overload, where news, analyses, and charts are available 24 hours a day with just a few clicks. Despite this unlimited access to data, however, the modern investor as well as the active trader face a new type of threat – information paralysis. The ability to filter the essential from the irrelevant is becoming a more important skill than the in-depth analysis of every available piece of data itself.
Les mer →Every active investor in financial markets eventually encounters the question of whether their emotions are truly the best advisors when trading. In an environment where a second of hesitation or a surge of fear can mean the difference between profit and loss, the term Expert Advisors (EA) is increasingly coming to the fore. These software algorithms, designed primarily for the MetaTrader platform, act as a sort of "autopilot" for financial markets. Although marketing campaigns often present them as automatic money-making machines, in reality, they are complex tools whose success depends on precise configuration and a deep understanding of the associated risks.
Les mer →